Announcement of Faculty Reviews 2024 - 2025
If you have information you would like to share about your experience with any of these faculty members, you are invited to write to the Faculty Personnel Policy and Review Committee - c/o Carol Cox, Academic Affairs, 133 Julian Science & Mathematics Center, or E-mail: ReviewComm@depauw.edu.
Fall Tenure and Promotion Faculty Reviews – Deadline for Letters: Monday, August 26, 2024
Kenneth Brown, Geology and Environmental Geoscience
Sarah Cowan, Art and Art History
Caitlin Howlett, Education Studies
Aldrin Magaya, History
Fall Term Faculty Reviews – Deadline for Letters: Monday, September 9, 2024
Kassahun Geleta, Economics and Management
McKenzie Lamb, Mathematical Sciences
Andrew Madison, Psychology and Neuroscience
Mary Martin, School of Music
Fall Interim Faculty Reviews – Deadline for Letters: Monday, September 30, 2024
Naomi Brooks, Kinesiology
Nipun Chopra, Psychology and Neuroscience
Town Oh, Economics and Management
Ryan Rudderham, Economics and Management
Aliyah Turner, Sociology and Anthropology
Dahee Yun, Film and Media Studies
Spring Interim Faculty Reviews – Deadline for Letters: Monday, January 27, 2025
Bin Qiu, Economics and Management
Janani Sridhar, School of Music
Because of DePauw University's open file policy, all such submissions will be available to the individual faculty member. Thus, you are asked either to indicate your awareness of this policy in your letter or to complete an open file policy form which can be obtained in the Office of Academic Affairs, 377 Julian Science and Mathematics Center, or on the Faculty Personnel Policy and Review website.
The most helpful letters are those confined to the personal experience of the letter writer. Since the criteria for review cover a broad set of categories spread over teaching, scholarly and artistic work, and service, your letter should only speak to your first-hand experience with the faculty member under review. It is neither helpful nor appropriate for a letter writer to make a recommendation for the outcome (e.g. granting tenure or promotion) since that implies a judgment based on incomplete information. A formal recommendation will be made by the review committees upon examination of all lines of evidence contained in the decision file.